I was informed recently that there is a quote from Stephen
King advising that a writer should always work on a piece of writing until it
is finished and never abandon it before that point is reached. There is another
quote from poet Paul Valery saying that a poem is never finished, but simply
abandoned.
The apparent conflict between these two statements is, I
believe, more of the definition one gives to the word “abandon.” I agree with
both of them. There have been many times I have been stalled in the middle of a
piece, not being able to make any headway toward finishing it. When, by using
any number of methods, I did get around to finishing the piece, it turned out
to be a very satisfactory effort—well worth finishing. On the other hand, I
find that when I pick up a piece I finished some time ago I invariably find
some things I want to change.
I was shown another aspect of the matter when I was taking
some courses in painting. There is a danger in trying to over-improve a work.
Sometimes the crisp strokes of a first effort have more value than overworking
something in order to improve it. The principle is as valid in writing as in
painting.
When is a work finished and when is it simply abandoned? I think it
is more a matter of opinion than anything—a cross between sticking with a piece
through thick and thin and simply knowing when to quit.